Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Guantanamo Bay And National Security - 1819 Words

Guantanamo Bay and National Security Chapter One: Introduction Introduction to the Chapter National security in the United States is more significant than ever before. With recent terrorist attacks in Europe, the Middle East, and within the United States, politicians as well as citizens have questioned how safe the country is compared to prior to the events of September 11th, 2001. The opening of the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base as a detention facility in 2002, serve the purpose of housing suspected terrorists and criminals that were responsible for the 9/11 attacks. These criminals included suspected member of the Islamic fundamentalist faction, the Taliban, and those thought to be responsible, members of al-Qaeda. However, throughout the nine years that it served as a detention facility, it was under extreme scrutiny, controversy, and ethical and legal dilemmas over the treatment of the prisoners. When President Obama announced the Guantanamo Bay would close on January 22nd, 2009 and issued the executive order to promptly close the facility, it was met with mixed emotion and criticism. While, the closure of the detention facility has yet to be fulfilled, there have been hundreds of prisoners released, or transferred to their countries, and presently less than one hundred remain in the detention facility. What this research chooses to explore is, if the Guantanamo Bay (GTMO) detention facilities are closed entirely how it will impact the United States national security?Show MoreRelatedEssay on Guantanamo Bay: The Thorn in America’s Side1141 Words   |  5 Pagesfinally ending up in Guantanamo Bay. There he was held without trial, prosecution, or evidence for four years (Zaeef 1-25). These circumstances have become commonplace at Guantanamo in recent years. Despite claims, by the United States government, that Guantanamo enforces the security of both America and the wor ld, the detention center should be shut down. Guantanamo should be shut down because it highlights America’s negative side, poses several risks against U.S. security, and creates stressedRead MoreThe Raising Issues Of Guantanamo Bay1047 Words   |  5 PagesThe Raising Issues Of Guantanamo Bay The issues that have had cause a lot of controversy since 2002.The closing of Guantanamo Bay has led to be the most reported prison that’s held prisoners against their own will. Due to against war on terror, but has yet most detainees havn’t been charged. We wonder in the closing of Guantanamo Bay who will it affect, what will happen, when will the closing of Guantanamo Bay takes place, and how will this play a role in the world today. If President Obama choosesRead MoreWhat Is Guantanamo Bay?1611 Words   |  7 PagesWhat is Guantanamo Bay? Guantanamo Bay is known for how they torture and interrogate terrorist, Guantanamo Bay is a military ran prison located at the Gitmo naval base in Cuba, Guantanamo Bay is also known as Gitmo. (The Editors of Encyclopà ¦dia Britannica, n.d.) Guantanamo Bay was constructed in different phases in two thousand and two. When it was first constructed it was used to house Muslims who were suspected of being terrorist and where captured by the U.S. in Afghanistan. Guantanamo was basicallyRead MoreGuantanamo Bay Detention Camp : The Gulag Of Our Times1424 Words   |  6 PagesGuantanamo Bay Detention Camp: The Gulag of Our Times Guantanamo Bay is an American military detention camp for prisoners of war, located within the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. The United States of America acquired the Guantanamo Bay Naval base in 1898 at the end of the Spanish-American War, when the USA took control of Cuba from Spain. The Naval Base was maintained well after the war, nearing the end of the 20th century, and within a rather small span of time, it underwent a transformation from navalRead MoreEssay on The Issues with Closing Guantanamo1474 Words   |  6 PagesThe United States military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has been occupied by over 700 Middle Eastern men suspected of terrorism since 2002. It has been home to some of the most heinous suspected terrorist to ever walk on this Earth. What to do with this military base, has been a major source of conflict within our nation and with other nations for over a decade, with no real reasoning substantial enough to close the base. Although our government has come forwa rd and declared that interrogationRead MoreGuantanamo Bay and Human Rights Violations by the United States1536 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is originally a naval base that was once used to house detention facilities for Haitian and Cuban refugees fleeing to the United States. It was also used as a refueling station for Navy ships. It was then converted into a high level detention facility to house enemy troops captured in the War on Terror campaign by Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfield. It has three main camps that house the prisoners. These prisoners of war were later referred to as enemy combatantsRead MoreComparison: Bush v. Obama and Guantanamo Detention Center1172 Words   |  5 Pagescontinued under President Barack Obama. President Bush wanted to restore the security of the United States. Many of the policies he enacted, while controversial, are still used by the current administration. One of these policies was the operation of the Guantanamo Bay detention center. While it has had far reaching domestic effects it is still a foreign policy issue by nature. The prisoners that have been hel d in Guantanamo come from all over the world, including Algeria, China, and Pakistan. The governmentsRead MoreShould Congress Close Guantanamo Bay Naval Station And Prison?1401 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction There is a problem in the United States. There is an excess of terrorists and having the most powerful nation on Earth means that these terrorists often end up in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This prison is based on 45 square miles of land that is known more commonly as Gitmo. Most people believe Guantanamo is a good concept but has gone terribly wrong. The government needs to do something because with the current proposal from President Obama, detainees would be moved ashore and abroad, whichRead MoreHomeland Security Essay1407 Words   |  6 Pages11th, 2001, intelligence activities has been one of the most controversial issues facing this country with one of the most controversial being the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Created in November of 2002 and concepted just two weeks after the attacks, the DHS focuses in five goals; prevent terrorism and enhance security, secure and manage the borders, enforce and administer immigration laws, safeguard and secure cyberspace, and ensure resilience to disasters. In order to achieve theseRead MoreA Brief Look at Guantanamo Bay 1263 Words   |  6 Pagestoday Guantanamo Bay has been a big topic in today’s society. On his campaign trail, President Obama pledged, â€Å"I will close Guantanamo bay detention center within a year of being elected†. My main argument has to be the amount of money were wasting on this prison. To be specific according to democratic lawmakers it has skyrocketed to $2.7 million per inmate. Guantanamo has been dubbed the most expensive prison on earth. President Barack Obama in May citied its cost then calculated at about $900

Monday, December 23, 2019

Narrators Role in Fitzgeralds The Great Gatsby and...

Narrators Role in Fitzgeralds The Great Gatsby and Kerouacs On The Road Over the last fifty years, since the release of On The Road in 1957, it has not been uncommon for critics to draw parallels between Kerouac’s semi-autobiographical novel and Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, released thirty-two years previously. It is for certain that both the novels share many similar traits, both examine concepts of American ideals and The American Dream, both are heavily influenced by the jazz age of the time, but nothing binds the novels closer to one another than the authors’ use of the first person narrative and that narrators relationship with their leading character. It is perhaps the most common reading to see both Jay Gatsby†¦show more content†¦Nick is told of Gatsby’s shady underworld connections and unhealthy obsession with a youthful love affair, whilst Sal is aware of Dean’s unstable background which saw him in and out of young offender units as well as knowing that he is one driven by his lust for both sex and drugs. It is left to A. E. Dyson to explain why Nick allows himself to be won over by such a character, [Nick Caraway’s] conscious moral instinct is to disapprove [of Gatsby]: but his imagination is fascinated since perhaps here, in this extraordinary man, the romantic promise is at last fulfilled. With this, Dyson is suggesting that Nick is just far too captivated by Gatsby and the world surrounding him, everything that makes him ‘great’, to disapprove of him. Sal’s reaction to Dean is much more straight-forward. It is revealed that Sal has always had an appetite for adventure and he states that it had always been his intention to travel America but has never experienced the guiding force to make him do it, it is easy to see from this why Sal is so mesmerised to his hero, whose enthusiasm not only drives himself but those around him. This is a sentiment picked up on by O. Swartz, Dean is the novel. Sal could spend his entire life travelling across the country, but without Dean, the travel could not be a transcendence. This is perhaps highlighted by the fact that Dean spends a lot of time driving Sal about the

Saturday, December 14, 2019

Federal Government of the United States and Sequestration Free Essays

Understanding Sequestration Christine Miller Webster University Author Note Christine A. Miller, Webster University. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Christine Miller, 21356 89th Street, California City, CA 93505. We will write a custom essay sample on Federal Government of the United States and Sequestration or any similar topic only for you Order Now E-mail: millers596@verizon. net Abstract Understanding sequestration can be overwhelming. What are government sequestration and the Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011 and how do they impact us? Which government agencies will feel the impact the most? Are there agencies that are exempt from the sequestration? And finally, is there a way to prevent the sequestration? A budget sequester is when money under current law is used to fund the budget deficit. President Barack Obama signed into law on Aug 2, 2011 a federal statute titled The Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011. This federal statute will impose limits on discretionary programs by more than $1 trillion over ten years from 2012 through 2021. These limits are based on the Congressional Budget Office baseline from 2010 (Kogan, 2011). Sequestration was technically triggered when Congress failed to reach an agreement by Jan. 5, 2012, but because the cuts do not begin until 2013, Congress really has until the end of this year to enact new legislation that would cancel or delay the cuts (OMB Watch, Nov 6, 2012). As an employee on a military installation, the impacts of the sequestration could cause short and long term effects on our contractor support. Understanding Sequestration Sequestration can be broadly defined as the action of taking le gal possession of assets until a debt has been paid or other claims have been met. In government terms, a sequestration is an attempt to reform Congressional voting procedures. This is an effort to make the size of the Federal government’s budget deficit a matter of conscious choice rather than simply the outcome of an appropriations process. A process in which no one ever looked at the cumulative results until it was too late to change them. If the appropriation bills passed separately by Congress provide for total government spending in excess of the limits Congress earlier laid down for itself in the annual Budget Resolution, and if Congress cannot agree on ways to cut back the total, then an automatic form of spending cutback takes place. This automatic spending cut is what is called sequestration (Johnson, 2005). What are the major elements of the BCA of 2011? First, it allowed the President to raise the debt limit by $2. 1 trillion. This limit is estimated to be enough through early 2013. Second, established limits on annual appropriations bills which cover discretionary or non-entitlement programs such as defense, education, national parks, the FBI, the EPA, low-income housing assistance, medical research, and many others; the limits reduce projected funding for these programs by more than $1 trillion through 2021. Third, it required the House and Senate to vote in the fall of 2011 on an amendment to the Constitution to mandate a balanced budget every year. Fourth, it established a Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to produce legislation to reduce projected deficits by at least an additional $1. 2 trillion through 2021 (beyond the savings generated by the discretionary caps). And finally, the BCA established a contingency mechanism to ensure that $1. 2 trillion in deficit reduction would be achieved if the Joint Select Committee failed. This provided for automatic, across-the-board budget cuts in many programs in 2013 and reductions in each year from 2014 through 2021 in the annual caps on discretionary appropriations as well as automatic cuts in selected entitlement programs (Kogan, 2011). Which government programs will feel the impact the most? If sequestration does take place the cuts will be divided evenly between the defense and non-defense programs, approximately $55 billion each. Non-exempt non-defense programs like Head Start and education programs will have an 8. 2% cut, approximately $38 billion. Non-exempt non-defense mandatory programs like agricultural disaster relief will have a 7. 6% cut, approximately $5. 6 billion. Payments to Medicare providers and health insurance plans will have a 2% cut, approximately $11 billion. In addition, non-exempt defense discretionary programs will have a 9. 4% cut, approximately $54. 6 billion (OMB Watch Nov 2, 2012). This includes keeping military bases open, paying salaries and research and development. The approximately $55 billion in 2013 defense cuts will be imposed in a similar but not identical manner. The defense cuts will occur through across-the-board, proportional reductions in the funding provided for defense accounts in the appropriations bills. War costs within the National Defense function are subject to sequestration, as are defense unobligated balances carried over from prior years. Although military personnel are not exempt from sequestration the President can exempt some or all military personnel funding from the sequestration. This is because the funds for fiscal year 2013 will already have been appropriated by Congress. However, if he chooses that option, the cuts in other defense funding would have to increase. As of Nov 13 the President did exempt military personnel from sequestration (OMB Watch Nov 2, 2012). Which government programs are exempt from automatic cuts? A number of programs are exempt to include Social Security benefits, all programs administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, interest on the federal debt, refundable tax credits, and several low-income programs. Low-income programs that are exempt include food stamps, child nutrition programs, Medicaid, foster care, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, mandatory funding under the Child Care and Development Fund, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and the Supplemental Security Income program (OMB Watch Nov 2, 2012). So what are the expectations for 2014 and beyond? The process for 2014 and out is quite different. The required defense funding cut of approximately $55 billion in each year from 2014 through 2021 will occur through reductions in the annual statutory caps on defense funding that the Budget Control Act sets for each of those years if sequestration is triggered. Unlike in 2013, there will be no automatic cut of all affected defense programs by the same percentage; instead, the Appropriations Committees will decide how to live within the newly reduced defense funding caps (Kogan, 2011). For non-defense programs the process will be the same as in 2013 for entitlements but different for non-defense discretionary programs. Medicare payments to both providers and health insurance plans will continue to be cut by 2 percent. However, because Medicare costs are projected to rise through 2021, the dollar amount saved will increase from $11 billion to approximately $18 billion in 2021. In years 2014 through 2012, the remaining amount of the approximately $55 billion in non-defense cuts will be applied proportionally to other non-exempt mandatory programs and overall non-defense discretionary funding. Because Medicare will take a progressively larger share of the $55 billion non-defense cut, other non-defense programs cuts will continue to decline (Kogan, 2011). One of the biggest concerns of the sequestration is the possibility of prompting a recession in 2013. The combination of expiring tax cuts and the reductions in spending on discretionary government programs, known as the ‘fiscal cliff’, could throw the country back into recession. However, the hopes are that a budget deal would be reached in early 2013 that would retroactively cancel the sequestration. Within the Department of Defense (DoD) there is a lot of concern with sequestration and the automatic cuts that would be implemented in fiscal year 2013 if Congress fails to reach an agreement on the deficit reduction plan. The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is working with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to ensure the Department is ready to implement sequestration in January if it occurs. In the meantime, consistent with OMB guidance, a memo titled Guidance on Fiscal Year 2013 Joint Committee Sequestration has been issued stating that DoD needs to continue normal spending and operations. The memo states to not let our programs, personnel, and activities to begin to suffer the harmful effects of sequestration while there is still a chance it can be avoided. The memo has directed that all commanders and managers in the DoD continue the defense mission under current laws and policies, without taking any steps that assume sequestration will occur (A. B. Carter, personal communication, Sep 25, 2012). In other words, the DoD is to continue business as usual. Although it is business as usual, government contractors may feel the greatest impact. In conclusion, sequestration would have long enduring and painful effects on all aspects of government agencies, DoD and non-DoD alike. If Congress does not meet the requirements imposed by the Budget Control Act of 2011 DoD government contractor layoffs and potential government shutdowns may occur and non-DoD government programs, like education and Medicare, will have long term consequences. Sequestration can only be prevented if Congress passes legislation that undoes the Budget Control Act of 2011 before January 2, 2013. References Johnson, P. (2005). A Glossary of Political Economy Terms. Retrieved from http://www. auburn. edu/~johnspm/gloss/sequestration Kogan, R. (2012). How the Across-the-Board Cuts in the Budget Control Act Will Work. Retrieved October 30, 2012, from http://www. cbpp. org/cms OMB Watch (Nov 2, 2012). Mitigating the Impact of a Temporary Sequester. Retrieved November 4, 2012, from http://www. ombwatch. org/mitigating-impact-of- automatic-spending-cuts OMB Watch (Nov 6, 2012). White House and Federal Agencies Could Manage Effects of Automatic Spending Cuts in Early 2013. Retrieved November 10, 2012, from http://www. ombwatch. org/node/12266 How to cite Federal Government of the United States and Sequestration, Papers

Friday, December 6, 2019

Soft Skills in Project Management for Production - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theSoft Skills in Project Management for Production. Answer: Introduction It has been found that soft skills are more effective as compare to the hard skills. Soft skills in project management play a significant role in making the project progress a lot better and well-organized. Hard skills in project management also have its importance. However, project management is considered as both; art and science as well. It is referred as science because project managers should need to estimate the budgets, making of the schedules and the management of costing is involved in to it. It is known as art and the main reason behind it includes the handling of the team members with their opinions and perspectives (Lucs, 2014). Thus, it is the duty of the manager to manager to use all the required techniques for managing and for making an effective communication process with them. Discussion It is denoted that soft skills in project management incorporate managing the staff members, guaranteeing customers for providing satisfaction in order to retain them for the long period of time. In addition to this, it can be stated that in order to create a favorable atmosphere the members of the team should need to work according to the given budget of the project and also with the right co-ordination of the individuals involved in the team (Pandey, 2015). This can only be possible when the team members are aware about the use of the soft skills. Moreover, there are many other reasons that highlight the significance of including the soft skills in their tasks and duties. In the view of Wheeler (2016), hard and soft skills the performance of the project can make it a lot better. However, soft skills are the most operational ones in order to enhance the project performance. Therefore, soft skills should need to be integrated the most in the organization. For this purpose, the management of the organization should need to incorporate trainings for their employees so their knowledge can be increased regarding the significance of the soft skills. It has been found that CHAOS chronicle (The Standish Group) reported that the failure rate of IT projects in USA is increasing. It is due to the reason that it helps the management to achieve the objectives of the projects in the most productive manner. Some reports showed that about 50% of the software projects suffered. It is due to the reason that the individuals with its making or formulation are not able to match decided deadline for the project (Rao, 2014). Moreover, it upsurges the budget of the project up to 50% because of the delay in its ending. This enhances the use of soft skills in many of the companies. The leader of the project must have to use the soft skills in order to manage the staff members who are part of the software project so it can be ended on the required time. Advantages of Using Soft Skills in Project Management It has been found that one of the core reasons for the failure of the project is ineffective communication. Soft skills is all about communicating in the entire making of the project, so more productive outcomes can be expected from it (Carvalho, 2015). Soft skills also remove the communication gap between the fellow members. Moreover, apart from the communication use in making the progress of the project better. One cannot ignore the importance of written and spoken skills of English. While formulating about the project instructions the associated stake holders should need to ensure that all of the related authorities must be able to co-ordinate with the written instructions as well. Hence, there are so many advantages that are related with the soft skills in the project management (Mousawa et al., 2015). Conclusion In a nutshell, the managers and the other authorities of the organization should need to make sure that they are using the right set of soft skills for the ending the project. The right use of the skills and effective communication a lot of hassles in the projects can get resolved which eventually helps in its management as well. Considering this in mind, in the recent times now all the organizations are trying to get soft skills knowledge. The management of the companies is also making their employees ready to understand its significance so they can be able to apply it on their projects in the most productive way. References Carvalho, M.M.D. and Rabechini Junior, R., 2015. Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills.International Journal of Production Research,53(2), pp.321-340. Lucs, A., 2014. Self-taught soft skills.Nature,506(7487), pp.257-257. Mousawa, D.T. and Elyas, T., 2015. Presentation as employability soft skill to esp learners in the English language institute at King Abdulaziz University.Journal of Language Teaching and Research,6(5), pp.1058-1062. Pandey, M. and Pandey, P., 2015. Global employability of unemployed youth through soft skills.International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies,2(2), pp.73-77. Rao, M.S., 2014. Enhancing employability in engineering and management students through soft skills.Industrial and Commercial Training,46(1), pp.42-48. Wheeler, R.E., 2016. Soft Skills-The Importance of Cultivating Emotional Intelligence.